On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 5:31 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
NETFILTER_CFG record generation was inconsistent for x_tables and
ebtables configuration changes. The call was needlessly messy and there
were supporting records missing at times while they were produced when
not requested. Simplify the logging call into a new audit_log_nfcfg
call. Honour the audit_enabled setting while more consistently
recording information including supporting records by tidying up dummy
checks.
Add an op= field that indicates the operation being performed (register
or replace).
Here is the enhanced sample record:
type=NETFILTER_CFG msg=audit(1580905834.919:82970): table=filter family=2 entries=83
op=replace
Generate audit NETFILTER_CFG records on ebtables table registration.
Previously this was being done for x_tables registration and replacement
operations and ebtables table replacement only.
See:
https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/25
See:
https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/35
See:
https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/43
Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com>
---
include/linux/audit.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
kernel/auditsc.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c | 12 ++++--------
net/netfilter/x_tables.c | 12 +++---------
4 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/audit.h b/include/linux/audit.h
index f9ceae57ca8d..f4aed2b9be8d 100644
--- a/include/linux/audit.h
+++ b/include/linux/audit.h
@@ -94,6 +94,11 @@ struct audit_ntp_data {
struct audit_ntp_data {};
#endif
+enum audit_nfcfgop {
+ AUDIT_XT_OP_REGISTER,
+ AUDIT_XT_OP_REPLACE,
+};
+
extern int is_audit_feature_set(int which);
extern int __init audit_register_class(int class, unsigned *list);
@@ -379,6 +384,8 @@ extern int __audit_log_bprm_fcaps(struct linux_binprm *bprm,
extern void __audit_fanotify(unsigned int response);
extern void __audit_tk_injoffset(struct timespec64 offset);
extern void __audit_ntp_log(const struct audit_ntp_data *ad);
+extern void __audit_log_nfcfg(const char *name, u8 af, unsigned int nentries,
+ enum audit_nfcfgop op);
static inline void audit_ipc_obj(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp)
{
@@ -514,6 +521,13 @@ static inline void audit_ntp_log(const struct audit_ntp_data *ad)
__audit_ntp_log(ad);
}
+static inline void audit_log_nfcfg(const char *name, u8 af, unsigned int nentries,
+ enum audit_nfcfgop op)
+{
+ if (audit_enabled)
+ __audit_log_nfcfg(name, af, nentries, op);
Do we want a dummy check here too? Or do we always want to generate
this record (assuming audit is enabled) because it is a configuration
related record?
--
paul moore