Re: watch structure

On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 11:35 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: > > Question: Would it be sane for Tim to go ahead and re-base his patch > > to the latest -mm and submit his RFC on linux-fsdevel now even before > > resolving the userspace interface issue? > > I would tentatively say yes. It may take a few days to finalize the list > watches. (Changing this structure the first step.) Hopefully, dumping the > whole list without a path doesn't change the underlying design in any > significant way. If dumping the whole list will change the design, we may > need to hold off depending on what the changes involve. Even if it requires significant internal changes to auditfs, I don't think it will have any impact on the hooks in the VFS, which is primarily what we need to get feedback on from linux-fsdevel.