Re: Perfromance issues

* Steve Grubb (sgrubb(a)redhat.com) wrote: > On Thursday 08 September 2005 13:28, Chris Wright wrote: > > Any micro optimisation needs to be benchmarked to show whether it's really > > useful (I'd expect this one to be in the noise even though assembly > > inspection should show improvement). > > I think we have to start thinking about this. People are comparing system > performance with audit disabled and enabled and not compiled in at all. The > hit is significant. We need to see what can be done to make it better. Absolutely agreed. Profiles would be quite helpful here. > > IMO, a better choice would be a static inline stub to keep from cluttering > > call sites.  Smth. like: > > I like this. Easy to contain the changes without a big change to any patch. > But just to be sure, I'm not talking only about the one case I posted. > syscall_entry & exit are a bigger hit as it affects all syscalls. Yup, generic change that potentially improves every call site.

thanks, -chris -- Linux-audit mailing list Linux-audit(a)redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit