Re: New audit-perms patch [ Re: Audit perms check on recv ]
* Serge Hallyn (serue(a)us.ibm.com) wrote:
I'm sorry, I thought that by "we are already way off
spec" you were
saying we shouldn't bother trying to follow the spec.
Ah, sorry. I meant we were way off spec already, but no need to add new
bits that are off spec if they are already specified in the draft.
I'll come back with a new patch after I go read the draft,
because the
meaning of CAP_AUDIT_CONTROL is not clear to me.
CAP_AUDIT_CONTROL is what you'd think of if it were CAP_AUDIT_ADMIN. It
means you can control the auditing subsytem (turn it on/off, etc).
thanks,
-chris
--
Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net