Re: [RFC][PATCH] (#7U4) file system auditing by location and name
On Monday 09 May 2005 10:35, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
Is that a fair analysis?
I guess. Is this good for you David?
Admittedly, my approach was sloppier, and it appeared it wasn't
working for you
Did it work for you?
Maybe we should be using unlikely() here?
Sure. The only other benefit that I could think of is that by deferring the
allocation, it only occurs IFF the filesystem auditing is used. Anyone doing
syscall only (or no auditing - just SE Linux avc denials) has a little bit of
memory saved.
-Steve