On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:48:39 -0400
Eric Paris <eparis(a)redhat.com> wrote:
currently audit_log_n_untrustedstring() uses
audit_string_contains_control() to check if the 'string' has any control
characters. If the 'string' has an embedded NULL
audit_string_contains_control() will return that the data has no control
characters and will then pass the string to audit_log_n_string with the
total length, not the length up to the first NULL. audit_log_n_string
does a memcpy of the entire length and so the actual audit record
emitted may then contain a NULL and then whatever random memory is after
the NULL.
Since we want to log the entire octet stream (if we can't trust the data
to be a string we can't trust that a NULL isn't actually a part of it)
we should just consider NULL as a control character. If the caller is
certain they want to stop at the first NULL they should be using
audit_log_untrustedstring.
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis(a)redhat.com>
---
Miloslav, this is also going to take care of nulls in the TTY_AUDIT_USER
message from userspace. Is it going to be common to have control
characters on that code path as well? Do you want to change
audit_receive_msg() to also use the hex encoding directly instead of the
_n_untrustedstring interface?
OK, I am now officially confused about the relationship between this
patch, Miloslav's two patches and 2.6.27/2.6.26/2.6.25.
Think I'll go into hiding for a while - please wake us up when it's all
sorted out.