Steve, thanks. I am finally back in my environment looking for the
problem-syntax based on your feedback. I found nothing that matches "key=
<space>" or "-k <space>".
I don't see the error anymore. Perhaps a coworker addressed it.
--------------------------
Warron French
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 2:38 PM Steve Grubb <sgrubb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hello,
On Thursday, May 20, 2021 12:08:56 PM EDT Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Thursday, May 20, 2021 10:56:00 AM EDT warron.french wrote:
> > Does anybody know what this error means?
> > augenrules: -F missing operation for -k
> >
> > I cannot figure out what rule is causing this, so I need a little
> > more context to figure out what to look for in my *.rules files under
> > /etc/audit/rules.d.
>
> It means there is no value associated with a -F name=value construct.
Actually, I misspoke. In the name=vale portion, it didn't find the '='
where
one was expected. Since it mentions '-k', you might be mixing watch syntax
with syscall syntax. -k keyname is valid with watches. For syscalls its
-F
key=keyname.
-Steve
> I am thinking syslog should have the line number in the rules where this
> comes from. Do you a -k some where that doesn't look right?
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit(a)redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit