Re: audit test results on lspp.12 kernel
Hi Steve,
Maybe you could post something about the standard logging
function and what the records ought to look like these days?
I think having consistent records is a good thing but it would
have been nice to see them here first since the changes have an
impact. Loulwa mentioned a case where the string is missing.
I don't know if its really missing or just not found exactly
as expected. Do you know if any messages were omitted as
part of the conversion?
Thanks,
-- ljk
Steve Grubb wrote:
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 16:38, Loulwa Salem wrote:
>Our test cases check for that string and
>are failing if it's not found... Is there a reason this was removed?
Everything was changed over to a standard logging function so that the format
will be consistent across all packages. Previously, each package had its own
format.
-Steve
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit