Re: should we convert struct audit_names to audit_aux_data?
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 16:01 -0500, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
Does it not make sense to consolidate all auxiliary data in the
audit_context to audit_aux_data? The audit_names structure looks like
a perfect candidate for audit_aux_data... yes/no?
In general, yes. But I think we're not able to allocate memory for
names. Wasn't this discussed before?
--
dwmw2