Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix the bug for missing field name before operator
On Thursday 07 August 2008 06:32:01 Zhang Xiliang wrote:
I think the way "f == v" can't make sure that they
didn't type -F =10.
After "v = strstr(pair, "=")" and v++. The v will not equal to f.
It is checked by "audit_name_to_field()", but not "f == v".
Because before v++, the "*v" is set to 0. we can use "*f == 0" to
check out
the case. The patch is for it.
Applied. Thanks for the patch !
-Steve