Re: audit 1.2.2 released
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 14:44 -0500, Michael C Thompson wrote:
Linda Knippers wrote:
> I'm running the .27 kernel and the 1.2.2 tools on an x86_64
> (Xeon/EM64T) SMP box with the targeted policy in enforcing mode.
> I tried to reproduce the problem discussed yesterday (the very fist
> rule doesn't take and the rest do) but it seems to work fine on my
> system.
I've been running mostly on an i686 (Intel) with the .27 kernel and
1.2.2 tools with the MLS policy. I've tested this on an x86_64 (AMD
opteron) and see this problem too. However, this problem does NOT exist
when using targeted policy, so it is most likely an MLS SELinux issue.
My MLS policy is 2.2.42
I've recently hit the same issue (or one that looks just like it[1]) on
current FC-5 with targeted policy in permissive mode.
[1] Program calls audit_log_user_message() at boot time, and gets -1
(EPERM) ... if you put a "for (int i = 1; i < 1; ++i)" in front of it,
it returns 0.
--
James Antill <jantill(a)redhat.com>
Attachments:
- signature.asc (application/pgp-signature — 191 bytes)