On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 12:40 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
Untested patch below, relative to 2.6.12-rc4-mm2 plus your
socketcall
patch to avoid the obvious conflict there. Is this what you had in
mind?
Yeah, basically. Although it would be better to introduce AUDIT_AVC_PATH
instead of using AUDIT_AVC for the type. If there's general agreement
this this is a sane answer, I'll stick it in the git tree. Can I see a
Signed-off-by line please?
--
dwmw2