On Nov 9, 2018, at 7:27 AM, Alexey Brodkin
<alexey.brodkin(a)synopsys.com> wrote:
Hi Andy,
> On Fri, 2018-11-09 at 07:17 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 6:22 AM Alexey Brodkin
> <alexey.brodkin(a)synopsys.com> wrote:
>> Hi Dmitry,
>>
>>> On Fri, 2018-11-09 at 06:16 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>>> syscall_get_arch() is required to be implemented on all architectures
>>> that use tracehook_report_syscall_entry() in order to extend
>>> the generic ptrace API with PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO request.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv(a)altlinux.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arc/include/asm/syscall.h | 6 ++++++
>>> include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 1 +
>>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
>>> index 818ae690ab79..a7149ceb5b98 100644
>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
>>> @@ -375,6 +375,7 @@ enum {
>>>
>>> #define AUDIT_ARCH_AARCH64 (EM_AARCH64|__AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT|__AUDIT_ARCH_LE)
>>> #define AUDIT_ARCH_ALPHA (EM_ALPHA|__AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT|__AUDIT_ARCH_LE)
>>> +#define AUDIT_ARCH_ARC (EM_ARC)
>>
>> Similarly here we need to have:
>> ---------------------------->8-----------------------------
>> +#define AUDIT_ARCH_ARC (EM_ARC|EM_ARCV2)
>> ---------------------------->8-----------------------------
>>
>
> Huh? How does the bitwise or of two ELF machine codes make any sense?
Oops... I didn't read examples of AUDIT_ARCH_ALPHA above :(
Indeed that was stupid.
But what would be a proper fix then?
Something like that?
---------------------------->8-----------------------------
#define AUDIT_ARCH_ARC (EM_ARC)
#define AUDIT_ARCH_ARCV2 (EM_ARCV2)
static inline int syscall_get_arch(void)
{
#ifdef __ARC700__
return AUDIT_ARCH_ARC;
#else
return AUDIT_ARCH_ARCV2;
#endif
}
---------------------------->8-----------------------------
Maybe, but I know basically nothing about ARC. Is the syscall numbering or calling
convention different on ARC vs ARCv2?