On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 13:10 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Friday 20 May 2005 12:55, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Although it would be better to introduce AUDIT_AVC_PATH
> instead of using AUDIT_AVC for the type.
I agree. If the parsing changes - I'd like to have a new record type.
Nothing is using AUDIT_AVC presently AFAICS. What is its intended use?
--
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency