On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 10:45:54AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Thu, 08 Nov 2018 19:17:13 PST (-0800), ldv(a)altlinux.org wrote:
> syscall_get_arch() is required to be implemented on all architectures
> that use tracehook_report_syscall_entry() in order to extend
> the generic ptrace API with PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO request.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv(a)altlinux.org>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h | 6 ++++++
> include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h
> index 8d25f8904c00..7e1e26ca7317 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> #ifndef _ASM_RISCV_SYSCALL_H
> #define _ASM_RISCV_SYSCALL_H
>
> +#include <uapi/linux/audit.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
>
> @@ -99,4 +100,9 @@ static inline void syscall_set_arguments(struct task_struct
*task,
> memcpy(®s->a1 + i * sizeof(regs->a1), args, n *
sizeof(regs->a0));
> }
>
> +static inline int syscall_get_arch(void)
> +{
> + return AUDIT_ARCH_RISCV;
> +}
> +
> #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_SYSCALL_H */
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> index c4c8b131af48..ad4105c602a1 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> @@ -405,6 +405,7 @@ enum {
> /* do not define AUDIT_ARCH_PPCLE since it is not supported by audit */
> #define AUDIT_ARCH_PPC64 (EM_PPC64|__AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT)
> #define AUDIT_ARCH_PPC64LE (EM_PPC64|__AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT|__AUDIT_ARCH_LE)
> +#define AUDIT_ARCH_RISCV (EM_RISCV|__AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT)
> #define AUDIT_ARCH_S390 (EM_S390)
> #define AUDIT_ARCH_S390X (EM_S390|__AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT)
> #define AUDIT_ARCH_SH (EM_SH)
I think this is incorrect: EM_RISCV has 32-bit and 64-bit variants, and if I
understand what's going on here this is marking all RISC-V targets as 64-bit.
Since this is a userspace header, I think the right thing to switch on is
__riscv_xlen, which will be defined to either 32 or 64 depending on the base
ISA.
We're also little endian.
OK, it means we need to introduce two different AUDIT_ARCH_ constants
for RISC-V. Do you have any preferences for their names,
e.g. AUDIT_ARCH_RISCV and AUDIT_ARCH_RISCV64, or
AUDIT_ARCH_RISCV and AUDIT_ARCH_RISCV32, or
AUDIT_ARCH_RISCV64 and AUDIT_ARCH_RISCV32,
or anything else?
--
ldv