Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved out by a new auditd
On Sunday, September 13, 2015 12:08:19 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
On 15/09/11, Paul Moore wrote:
> Although I suppose if nothing else we could send a record indicating
> that another auditd attempted to replace it ... if we can send it
> great, drop the new request and be glad we audited it, if we can't
> send it, reset the auditd tracking.
This is actually a good idea.
This would go well with your last patch to try harder on netlink send
failures. On a related note, with the merge window closed I just rotated the
audit tree so that patch is now in linux-audit#next.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com