On 15/11/12, Peter Hurley wrote:
On 11/12/2015 02:10 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 15/11/10, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> The tty termios bits cannot change while n_tty_read() is in the
>> i/o loop; the termios_rwsem ensures mutual exclusion with termios
>> changes in n_tty_set_termios(). Check L_ICANON() directly and
>> eliminate icanon parameter.
>>
>> NB: tty_audit_add_data() => tty_audit_buf_get() => tty_audit_buf_alloc()
>> is a single path; ie., tty_audit_buf_get() and tty_audit_buf_alloc()
>> have no other callers.
>
> Which tree is this based on? I don't see where the first chunk applies.
4.3
but this series requires a -stable fix [1] posted earlier but not in any
tree yet, which I noted in the cover-letter (was easy to overlook).
Ok, found it. It appears to also depend on "n_tty: Uninline
tty_copy_to_user()" [2] which I didn't see mentioned and can't find
upstream. Is that in an upstream tree?
[2]
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/8/146
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs(a)redhat.com>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545