On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
RFE: add additional fields for use in audit filter exclude rules
https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/5
Re-factor and combine audit_filter_type() with audit_filter_user() to
use audit_filter_user_rules() to enable the exclude filter to
additionally filter on PID, UID, GID, AUID, LOGINUID_SET, SUBJ_*.
The process of combining the similar audit_filter_user() and
audit_filter_type() functions, required inverting the meaning and
including the ALWAYS action of the latter.
Keep the check to quit early if the list is empty.
Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com>
---
v2: combine audit_filter_user() and audit_filter_type() into
audit_filter().
---
include/linux/audit.h | 2 --
kernel/audit.c | 4 ++--
kernel/audit.h | 2 ++
kernel/auditfilter.c | 46 ++++++++++------------------------------------
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
Patches that remove more code than the add always make me happy :)
Comment below ...
diff --git a/include/linux/audit.h b/include/linux/audit.h
index 32cdafb..539c1d9 100644
--- a/include/linux/audit.h
+++ b/include/linux/audit.h
@@ -160,8 +160,6 @@ extern void audit_log_task_info(struct audit_buffer *ab,
extern int audit_update_lsm_rules(void);
/* Private API (for audit.c only) */
-extern int audit_filter_user(int type);
-extern int audit_filter_type(int type);
extern int audit_rule_change(int type, __u32 portid, int seq,
void *data, size_t datasz);
extern int audit_list_rules_send(struct sk_buff *request_skb, int seq);
diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
index 384374a..2dfaa19 100644
--- a/kernel/audit.c
+++ b/kernel/audit.c
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr
*nlh)
if (!audit_enabled && msg_type != AUDIT_USER_AVC)
return 0;
- err = audit_filter_user(msg_type);
+ err = audit_filter(msg_type, AUDIT_FILTER_USER);
if (err == 1) { /* match or error */
err = 0;
if (msg_type == AUDIT_USER_TTY) {
@@ -1362,7 +1362,7 @@ struct audit_buffer *audit_log_start(struct audit_context *ctx,
gfp_t gfp_mask,
if (audit_initialized != AUDIT_INITIALIZED)
return NULL;
- if (unlikely(audit_filter_type(type)))
+ if (unlikely(!audit_filter(type, AUDIT_FILTER_TYPE)))
return NULL;
if (gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) {
diff --git a/kernel/audit.h b/kernel/audit.h
index cbbe6bb..1879f02 100644
--- a/kernel/audit.h
+++ b/kernel/audit.h
@@ -327,6 +327,8 @@ extern pid_t audit_sig_pid;
extern kuid_t audit_sig_uid;
extern u32 audit_sig_sid;
+extern int audit_filter(int msgtype, unsigned int listtype);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL
extern int __audit_signal_info(int sig, struct task_struct *t);
static inline int audit_signal_info(int sig, struct task_struct *t)
diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
index 96c9a1b..f90c042 100644
--- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
+++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
@@ -1349,50 +1349,24 @@ static int audit_filter_user_rules(struct audit_krule *rule, int
type,
return 1;
}
-int audit_filter_user(int type)
+int audit_filter(int msgtype, unsigned int listtype)
{
enum audit_state state = AUDIT_DISABLED;
struct audit_entry *e;
- int rc, ret;
-
- ret = 1; /* Audit by default */
+ int rc, result = 1; /* Audit by default */
rcu_read_lock();
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(e, &audit_filter_list[AUDIT_FILTER_USER], list) {
- rc = audit_filter_user_rules(&e->rule, type, &state);
- if (rc) {
- if (rc > 0 && state == AUDIT_DISABLED)
- ret = 0;
- break;
- }
- }
- rcu_read_unlock();
-
- return ret;
-}
-
-int audit_filter_type(int type)
-{
- struct audit_entry *e;
- int result = 0;
-
- rcu_read_lock();
- if (list_empty(&audit_filter_list[AUDIT_FILTER_TYPE]))
+ if (list_empty(&audit_filter_list[listtype]))
goto unlock_and_return;
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(e, &audit_filter_list[AUDIT_FILTER_TYPE],
- list) {
- int i;
- for (i = 0; i < e->rule.field_count; i++) {
- struct audit_field *f = &e->rule.fields[i];
- if (f->type == AUDIT_MSGTYPE) {
- result = audit_comparator(type, f->op, f->val);
- if (!result)
- break;
- }
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(e, &audit_filter_list[listtype], list) {
+ rc = audit_filter_user_rules(&e->rule, msgtype, &state);
Any reason not to do away with audit_filter_user_rules() and just
insert the code here? As far as I can tell there are no other callers
...
+ if (rc) {
+ if (rc > 0 && ((state == AUDIT_DISABLED) ||
+ (listtype == AUDIT_FILTER_TYPE)))
+ result = 0;
+ break;
}
- if (result)
- goto unlock_and_return;
}
unlock_and_return:
rcu_read_unlock();
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com