Re: audit_log_drain
* David Woodhouse (dwmw2(a)infradead.org) wrote:
Hunk #1 FAILED at 143.
patch: **** malformed patch at line 91: {
skb_queue_tail(&ab->sklist, skb);
On the offending line, why skb_queue_tail() -- shouldn't this queue back
at the _head_ of the queue?
(I know it was already like that before you touched it, Steve, but I
still don't think it's _right_).
Actually, I agree. What's the point? We should requeue the skb that we
choked on at the head to help guarantee that it's (as close as possible
to) the first retransmitted.
thanks,
-chris