On Friday, January 23, 2015 05:30:56 AM Al Viro wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 09:40:01PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 09:29:03PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 04:25:13PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > Your experimental branch looks good to me, thanks.
> >
> > Pushed into for-next; I'm probably going to move that stuff into a
> > never-rebased branch, merged into for-next and safe to pull into your
> > tree if you want to do something on top of that set.
>
> OK, vfs.git#getname is it; it's in never-to-be-rebased mode and it's
> merged
> into vfs.git#for-next (as of right now; HEAD is 9ee4c4). If you need to
> do
> something on top of that stuff, pulling vfs.git#getname is safe.
Unfortunately, that thing was -rc2-based, leading to conflict with mainline
in kernel/auditsc.c. My fault, I hadn't realized that "audit: create
private file name copies when auditing inodes" in audit tree was, in fact,
present in mainline. vfs.git#getname2 is -rc3-based, same resulting
kernel/auditsc.c as in #getname. Please, use that. vfs.git#for-next
merges from that one now, so tomorrow -next should have no problems from
vfs.git...
No worries, thanks for the update.
--
paul moore
security @ redhat