Re: [PATCH v20 05/23] net: Prepare UDS for security module stacking
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 7:58 PM Casey Schaufler <casey(a)schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
On 9/4/2020 2:53 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 5:35 PM Casey Schaufler <casey(a)schaufler-ca.com>
wrote:
>> On 9/4/2020 1:08 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
...
> I understand the concerns you mention, they are all valid as far
as
> I'm concerned, but I think we are going to get burned by this code as
> it currently stands.
Yes, I can see that. We're getting burned by the non-extensibility
of secids. It will take someone smarter than me to figure out how to
fit N secids into 32bits without danger of either failure or memory
allocation.
Sooo what are the next steps here? It sounds like there is some
agreement that the currently proposed unix_skb_params approach is a
problem, but it also sounds like you just want to merge it anyway?
I was sorta hoping for something a bit better.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com