On Tuesday 09 May 2006 10:59, Klaus Weidner wrote:
I think having a separate record type would be an alternative to the
"new_" (or "new ") prefix. If the record types are distinct, it would
be
possible to use the same field names for current and requested object
properties.
I'd rather see the word "new" separated by a space so that searching is
better/easier.
-Steve