From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd(a)arndb.de>
gcc warns about an empty statement when audit_remove_mark is defined to
nothing:
kernel/auditfilter.c: In function 'audit_data_to_entry':
kernel/auditfilter.c:609:51: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if'
statement [-Werror=empty-body]
609 | audit_remove_mark(entry->rule.exe); /* that's the template
one */
| ^
Change the macros to use the usual "do { } while (0)" instead, and change a
few more that were (void)0, for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd(a)arndb.de>
---
kernel/audit.h | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/audit.h b/kernel/audit.h
index 3b9c0945225a..c39c5f3b8422 100644
--- a/kernel/audit.h
+++ b/kernel/audit.h
@@ -302,8 +302,8 @@ extern struct list_head *audit_killed_trees(void);
#define audit_alloc_mark(k, p, l) (ERR_PTR(-EINVAL))
#define audit_mark_path(m) ""
-#define audit_remove_mark(m)
-#define audit_remove_mark_rule(k)
+#define audit_remove_mark(m) do { } while (0)
+#define audit_remove_mark_rule(k) do { } while (0)
#define audit_mark_compare(m, i, d) 0
#define audit_exe_compare(t, m) (-EINVAL)
#define audit_dupe_exe(n, o) (-EINVAL)
@@ -311,8 +311,8 @@ extern struct list_head *audit_killed_trees(void);
#define audit_remove_tree_rule(rule) BUG()
#define audit_add_tree_rule(rule) -EINVAL
#define audit_make_tree(rule, str, op) -EINVAL
-#define audit_trim_trees() (void)0
-#define audit_put_tree(tree) (void)0
+#define audit_trim_trees() do { } while (0)
+#define audit_put_tree(tree) do { } while (0)
#define audit_tag_tree(old, new) -EINVAL
#define audit_tree_path(rule) "" /* never called */
#define audit_kill_trees(context) BUG()
--
2.29.2