On Wednesday, August 05, 2015 11:40:34 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
On 15/08/05, Paul Moore wrote:
> I suspect it was lost in the noise when I mentioned it on v4, but how
> about changing AUDIT_DEV_UNSET to "(dev_t)-1"?
I saw your comment only after resubmitting. I'm fine either way. If it
is needed for uapi later it can be changed then. Is it easy to change
in your workflow, or should I resubmit? I know you routinely change the
patch description, but could not remember if you have actually changed
the patch itself...
With the exception of trivial merge conflicts, in general I like to avoid
changing the body of the patches when I apply them; there are always going to
be exceptions, but when possible I try to avoid it. I consider tweaking the
patch subject lines pretty trivial, especially in the last case where the
subject line had become wrong/invalid due to changes in the patch itself.
--
paul moore
security @ redhat