On Thursday, November 07, 2013 10:42:21 AM Eric Paris wrote:
> I am confused. This is the abnormal end event I have:
>
>
> type=ANOM_ABEND msg=audit(1303339663.307:142): auid=4325 uid=0 gid=0
> ses=1
> subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0 pid=3775 comm="aureport"
> sig=11>
>
>
> Why / when did we start adding text explanations? We should not do that.
> We didn't have it before and it should not have been added. The signal
> number is enough to identify the problem.
We started adding a reason when seccomp started sending ANOM_ABEND
events as well. It doesn't do so with a signal. Agreed, the " " is/was
a bad idea...
Does seccomp still send these? I see there is an AUDIT_SECCOMP event being
sent by __audit_seccomp(). Does seccomp do anything with ABEND at this point?
-Steve