On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 08:23:46 -0500
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> I thought that the prime audit connection requires a capability
> check to ensure a process without proper privilege does not replace
> the audit daemon...since that's now possible. Are there privilege
> checks for who can connect to the audit socket? Shouldn't that
> process also have CAP_AUDIT_READ since that is what it will be
> doing?
The only cap that will let a daemon be checked for replacement is
CAP_AUDIT_CONTROL. CAP_AUDIT_READ is only used for the unreliable
reception of multicast audit log records.
The unicast socket is gated by CAP_AUDIT_CONTROL and CAP_AUDIT_WRITE.
The multicast read-only unreliable socket is gated by
CAP_AUDIT_READ.
My understanding was that CAP_AUDIT_READ was required by everything
that read, including unicast. That is why it checks that capability
CAP_AUDIT_READ. Shouldn't everything reading need that capability?
-Steve