On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 08:23:46 -0500
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
 > I thought that the prime audit connection requires a capability
 > check to ensure a process without proper privilege does not replace
 > the audit daemon...since that's now possible. Are there privilege
 > checks for who can connect to the audit socket? Shouldn't that
 > process also have CAP_AUDIT_READ since that is what it will be
 > doing?  
 
 The only cap that will let a daemon be checked for replacement is
 CAP_AUDIT_CONTROL.  CAP_AUDIT_READ is only used for the unreliable
 reception of multicast audit log records.
 
 The unicast socket is gated by CAP_AUDIT_CONTROL and CAP_AUDIT_WRITE.
 The multicast read-only unreliable socket is gated by
 CAP_AUDIT_READ. 
My understanding was that CAP_AUDIT_READ was required by everything
that read, including unicast. That is why it checks that capability
CAP_AUDIT_READ. Shouldn't everything reading need that capability?
-Steve