On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 10:01 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 2020-07-28 14:47, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 12:27 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > I know you like only really minimal fixes this late, but this seemed
> > pretty minimal to me...
>
> Minimal is a one (two?) line NULL check in audit_log_name(), this
> patch is not that.
I didn't try and test that since I'm not sure that would have worked
because there appeared to be a low non-NULL value in it. brauer1's trace had
0x60 and mine had 0xd0. Or am I missing something obvious?
Well, you mentioned the obvious already: both 0x60 and 0xd0 are not
NULL. We already have a NULL check for context->pwd elsewhere so
there is precedence for this solving a similar problem, although
without going through the git log I'm not sure what problem that
solved, or if it was precautionary.
I agree the low value looks suspicious, it almost looks like an offset
to me, ideally it would be good to understand how/why that value is
"off'. It could be that the audit_context is not being properly
initialized, reset, or something unrelated is clobbering the value;
all things that would be nice to know.
The patch provided the information rather than ignoring the problem
...
I disagree.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com