On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:34:38PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Sunday, July 26, 2015 09:49:50 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 03:58:44PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > Apparently audit is FTBFS with clang due to the embedded version of
> > libev with the following error (see: [0]):
> >
> > ../../../../src/libev/ev.c:970:42: error: '_Noreturn' keyword must
> > precede function declarator
> >
> > The bug[0] provides a patch. I don't think this has been fixed
> > upstream yet. There was however a small thread [1] about this on
> > upstream ML.
> >
> Not sure what's the policy regarding patching embedded copy of libev.
> The policy is to kill the embedded copy as soon as possible.
> Seems like a good time to do that.
Not sure if you've ever had any dealings with upstream libev or not. But let's
just say its not easy. I apply a patch on top of libev to suit audit's needs.
https://fedorahosted.org/audit/changeset/782
Without this, coverity analysis is much harder. Audit is one of those
subsystems that you really need to be sure of what its doing and that even
libraries it uses are correct.
You're right, I should have remembered that
libev wants to be a copylib.
Zbyszek