On Mon 22-08-22 10:34:15, Paul Moore wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 4:50 AM Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> wrote:
> On Mon 22-08-22 10:29:05, Gaosheng Cui wrote:
> > Audit_alloc_mark() assign pathname to audit_mark->path, on error path
> > from fsnotify_add_inode_mark(), fsnotify_put_mark will free memory
> > of audit_mark->path, but the caller of audit_alloc_mark will free
> > the pathname again, so there will be double free problem.
> >
> > Fix this by resetting audit_mark->path to NULL pointer on error path
> > from fsnotify_add_inode_mark().
> >
> > Fixes: 7b1293234084d ("fsnotify: Add group pointer in
fsnotify_init_mark()")
> > Signed-off-by: Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1(a)huawei.com>
>
> Good spotting! The patch looks good to me. Feel free to add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz>
>
> > ---
> > kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/audit_fsnotify.c b/kernel/audit_fsnotify.c
> > index 6432a37ac1c9..c565fbf66ac8 100644
> > --- a/kernel/audit_fsnotify.c
> > +++ b/kernel/audit_fsnotify.c
> > @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark(struct
audit_krule *krule, char *pa
> >
> > ret = fsnotify_add_inode_mark(&audit_mark->mark, inode, 0);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > + audit_mark->path = NULL;
> > fsnotify_put_mark(&audit_mark->mark);
As I'm tracing the code path from audit through fsnotify, and back
into audit, I'm wondering if we still have a problem. When
fsnotify_add_inode_mark() fails it will end up freeing not just
audit_mark->path, but audit_mark itself via audit_fsnotify_mark_free()
(via a call into fsnotify_put_mark()), yes?
I don't think so. fsnotify_add_mark_locked() will call fsnotify_put_mark()
but that is just a counter part to fsnotify_get_mark() a few lines above.
The caller of fsnotify_add_inode_mark() still holds its own mark reference
which prevents mark from being freed.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR