On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 05:09 +0000, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
Hello,
This is an updated patch with the spinlock correctly defined. I'm assuming
both oops Stephen reported were the same one (since the spinlock would be
used in both cases).
Yes, and this patch corrects that problem. I verified that after
running:
auditctl -e 1
auditctl -w /etc/shadow -k SHADOW -p w
subsequently running 'passwd' to change my own password multiple times
correctly generated multiple audit records (for the rename(2) call).
I also tried running 'vipw' as an admin, which generated a series of
audit messages (for an access(2) call, a link(2) call, and the rename(2)
call).
--
Stephen Smalley <sds(a)tycho.nsa.gov>
National Security Agency