On 12/07/2013 06:00 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Gao feng (gaofeng(a)cn.fujitsu.com):
> 1, remove the permission check of pid namespace. it's no reason
> to deny un-init pid namespace to operate audit subsystem.
>
> 2, only allow init user namespace and init audit namespace to
> operate list/add/del rule, tty set, trim, make equiv operations.
>
> 3, allow audit namespace to get/set audit configuration, send
> userspace audit message.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gao feng <gaofeng(a)cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> kernel/audit.c | 13 ++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> index 095f54d..c4d4291 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> @@ -573,11 +573,7 @@ out:
> static int audit_netlink_ok(struct sk_buff *skb, u16 msg_type)
> {
> int err = 0;
> -
> - /* Only support the initial namespaces for now. */
> - if ((current_user_ns() != &init_user_ns) ||
> - (task_active_pid_ns(current) != &init_pid_ns))
> - return -EPERM;
> + struct audit_namespace *ns = current->nsproxy->audit_ns;
>
> switch (msg_type) {
> case AUDIT_LIST:
> @@ -586,6 +582,7 @@ static int audit_netlink_ok(struct sk_buff *skb, u16 msg_type)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> case AUDIT_GET:
> case AUDIT_SET:
> + break;
So, these AUDIT_SET and AUDIT_GET go from requiring CAP_AUDIT_CONTROL
to not needing any privs at all?
My mistake, there should be a check such as
ns_capable(ns, CAP_AUDIT_CONTROL).
will fix in next version.
Thanks!