Re: [PATCH ghak59 V3 2/4] audit: add syscall information to CONFIG_CHANGE records
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 2:26 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 2019-01-17 12:36, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:08 AM Steve Grubb <sgrubb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 08:21:40 -0500 Paul Moore <paul(a)paul-moore.com>
wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 4:33 AM Steve Grubb <sgrubb(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:58:58 -0500 Paul Moore
<paul(a)paul-moore.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 5:18 PM Richard Guy Briggs
<rgb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Tie syscall information to all CONFIG_CHANGE calls since
they
> > > > > > are all a result of user actions.
> I see you added LKML to the To/CC line. Fun. Unless they've been
> following the audit list for the past several years I'm not sure they
> have all the context to fully understand some of the things in this
> thread, but sure, why not.
I added LKML in the original patchset posting, not Steve.
That you did, my apologies. Why did my mail client highlight that as
new? Oh well, my comments stand regardless; I'm just sorry about the
LKML noise I added to the top.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com