On Wednesday 27 April 2005 16:32, Chris Wright wrote:
NULL terminating the buffer doesn't look safe.
It should be. Surely we know how long the buffer is. Admittedly, there's
another bug that's in printk's handling of %*.* stuff. But even with that
fixed, it would be more efficient (timewise) to terminate the string so
printk doesn't have to interpret the *.* stuff.
-Steve