On Thursday, May 14, 2015 11:23:09 PM Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Richard Guy Briggs
<rgb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On 15/05/14, Paul Moore wrote:
>> * Look at our existing audit records to determine which records should
>> have
>> namespace and container ID tokens added. We may only want to add the
>> additional fields in the case where the namespace/container ID tokens are
>> not the init namespace.
>
> If we have a record that ties a set of namespace IDs with a container
> ID, then I expect we only need to list the containerID along with auid
> and sessionID.
The problem here is that the kernel has no concept of a "container", and I
don't think it makes any sense to add one just for audit. "Container" is
a
marketing term used by some userspace tools.
No, its a real thing just like a login. Does the kernel have any concept of a
login? Yet it happens. And it causes us to generate events describing who,
where from, role, success, and time of day. :-)
I can imagine that both audit could benefit from a concept of a
namespace *path* that understands nesting (e.g. root/2/5/1 or
something along those lines). Mapping these to "containers" belongs
in userspace, I think.
I don't doubt that just as user space sequences the actions that are a login.
I just need the kernel to do some book keeping and associate the necessary
attributes in the event record to be able to reconstruct what is actually
happening.
-Steve