Re: New development
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 14:17 -0400, Amy Griffis wrote:
I know Dustin has been working on some LSPP development, and he
expressed interest in incorporating his patch somewhere when it's
ready.
Amy is correct--I'd like to continue working on the enhancements of
audit required for LSPP compliance. Today is my first day back from a
week's vacation, and I intend on resubmitting an updated lspp_audit
patch incorporating Amy/Steve's latest suggestions within the next day
or two. Perhaps after this patch is integrated, the binary record to-do
sounds interesting to me...
If we haven't finished 1-5 by the time Dustin's patch is
ready, do you plan to have development going on in multiple kernels at
once? I ask this because what you said about jumping over would imply
that you are not.
I've been diffing against the latest -mm tree when I submit these
lspp_audit patches, as per David Woodhouse's request. Let's agree on a
different tree if that's where we're going.
:-Dustin
Attachments:
- signature.asc (application/pgp-signature — 189 bytes)