Yeah, I saw that (and tried it out, but reverted when I noticed the
truncation issues). Nice feature!
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Steve Grubb <sgrubb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, July 13, 2016 12:32:55 PM EDT Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 13, 2016 9:22:57 AM EDT Chris Nandor wrote:
> > Secondary question: the reason for what I'm working on is that we want
to
> > be able to audit what folks do as root on our production hosts. We're
not
> > a bank, and a perfect solution is not required, but we do need to be
able
> > to take reasonable steps to find out if people with access are doing
bad
> > things.
> >
> > Is this setup reasonable for that purpose?
>
> Yes. You would want to do two things, first enable tty auditing. This is
> done by the pam_tty_audit module. Second consider adding the
> 32-power-abuse.rules to your rules.
>
> > I know that's a loaded question
> > and I can answer any questions anyone has that are necessary to figure
> > this
> > out. I am not asking so much about rules, but about architecture:
logging
> > according to whatever rules we set up, to the local audit.log and
> > immediately to a remote using audisp-remote, so the log can't be easily
> > manipulated.
>
> Remote logging is the defence against local log manipulation.
Another thing to consider is that the 2.6 version of the audit user space
has
a new logging format. You might consider going into auditd.conf and setting
log_format = enriched. This resolves some information locally before
sending
it to the remote system.
-Steve