Hello,
On Wednesday, August 11, 2021 7:53:15 PM EDT Steve Grubb wrote:
On Wednesday, August 11, 2021 3:40:51 PM EDT Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-08-11 at 11:40 +0000, THOBY Simon wrote:
> Other than the two questions on " IMA: add a policy option to restrict
> xattr hash algorithms on appraisal" patch, the patch set is looking
> good.
>
> thanks,
>
> Mimi
>
> > Here is also a short description of the new audit messages, but I can
> > send it in a followup mail if that is not the proper place:
> >
> > When writing the xattr with an algorithm not built in the kernel (here
> > the kernel was built with CONFIG_CRYPTO_MD5 unset), e.g. with
> >
> > "evmctl ima_hash -a md5 /usr/bin/strace":
> > audit(1628066120.418:121): pid=1344 uid=0 auid=0 ses=1
> > subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 op=set_data
> > cause=unavailable-hash-algorithm comm="evmctl" name="/usr/bin/
strace"
> > dev="dm-0" ino=2632657 res=0 errno=0>
Is this audit event accurate? I seem to be seeing name=value=value. I'm
hoping this is a copy/paste/mail client issue.
Sorry for the noise...I see there is a space in there.
-Steve