On Wed, 2018-05-30 at 18:15 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 05/30/2018 06:00 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-05-30 at 17:49 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
>> So the other choice is to only keep patches 1,2, 6, and 7, so leave most
>> of the integrity audit messages untouched. Then only create a different
>> format for the new AUDIT_INTEGRITY_POLICY_RULE (current 8/8) that shares
>> (for consistency reasons) the same format with the existing integrity
>> audit messages but also misses tty= and exe= ?
> Another option would be for the new AUDIT_INTEGRITY_POLICY_RULE to
> call audit_log_task_info() similar to what ima_audit_measurement()
> does.
Right. [That would mean keep 1,2, 7 and modify 8.] Is that the best
solution?
Yes, I think so. Calling audit_log_task_info() will only add the
"exe=" and "tty=" to the new AUDIT_INTEGRITY_POLICY_RULE.