How about permitted rather then allowed.
On 04/29/2014 10:59 PM, Eric Paris wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 16:54 -0700, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> Requested for Android in order to distinguish denials that are not in
> fact breaking anything yet due to permissive domains versus denials
> that are being enforced, but seems generally useful. result field was
> already in the selinux audit data structure and was being passed to
> avc_audit() but wasn't being used. Seems to cause no harm to ausearch
> or audit2allow to add it as a field. Comments?
I think it's a great idea, but I'm worried that Steve is going to get
grumpy because an AVC record is going to have a result= field which is
similar, but not necessarily related to the res= field of a SYSCALL
record. Seems easily confused (although probably 9999 times out of
10000 they will be the same)
So while I wholeheartedly think we should take the idea, I wonder if
someone can dream up a name that isn't confusingly similar...
I can't think of anything...
-Eric
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit