On Tuesday, February 28, 2017 10:37:04 PM EST Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
Sorry, I forgot to include Cc: in this cover letter for context to
the 4
alt patches.
On 2017-02-28 22:15, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> The background to this is:
>
https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/8
>
> In short, audit SYSCALL records for *init_module were occasionally
> accompanied by hundreds to thousands of null PATH records.
>
> I chatted with Al Viro and Eric Paris about this Friday afternoon and
> they seemed to vaguely recall this issue and didn't have any solid
> recommendations as to what was the right thing to do (other than the
> same suggestion from both that I won't print here).
>
> It was reproducible on a number of vintages of distributions with
> default kernels, but triggering on very few of the many modules loaded
> at boot time. It was reproduced with fs-nfs4 and nfsv4 modules on
> tracefs, but there are reports of it also happening with debugfs. It
> was triggering only in __audit_inode_child with a parent that was not
> found in the task context's audit names_list.
>
> I have four potential solutions listed in my order of preference and I'd
> like to get some feedback about which one would be the most acceptable.
0.5 - Notice that we are in *init_module & delete_module and inhibit
generation of any record type except SYSCALL and KERN_MODULE ? There are some
classification routines for -F perms=wrxa that might be used to create a new
class for loading/deleting modules that sets a flag that we use to suppress
some record types.
> 1 - In __audit_inode_child, return immedialy upon detecting
TRACEFS and
>
> DEBUGFS (and potentially other filesystems identified, via s_magic).
XFS creates them too. Who knows what else.
-Steve
> 2 - In __audit_inode_child, return after not finding the parent
in that
>
> task context's audit names_list.
>
> 3 - In __audit_inode_child, mark the parent and its child as "hidden"
>
> when the parent isn't found in that task context's audit names_list.
> This will still result in an "items=" count that does not match the
> number of accompanying PATH records for that SYSCALL record, which
> may upset userspace tools but would still indicate suppressed
> records.
>
> 4 - In __audit_inode_child, when the parent isn't found, store the
>
> child's dentry in the child's (new or not) audit_names structure
> (properly refcounted with dget) and store the parent's dentry in its
> newly created audit_names structure (via dget_parent), then if the
> name isn't available at PATH record generation time, use that stored
> value (with dentry_path_raw and released with dput)
>
> Is there another more elegant solution that I've missed that catches
> things before they get anywhere near audit_inode_child (called from
> tracefs' notifiers)?
>
> I'll thread onto this message tested patches for all four solutions.