On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 07:36, Stephen Smalley wrote:
Why not just call the security handler from the
security_netlink_send()
function, which is already called by netlink_sendmsg()?
Ok, I can see why you wouldn't want to do that, but why not just call
the handler immediately after security_netlink_send() then in
netlink_sendmsg()? What is the advantage of deferring to
netlink_sendskb (and some other location for broadcasts)?
--
Stephen Smalley <sds(a)tycho.nsa.gov>
National Security Agency