Re: [PATCH] One more XFRM audit fix
On Thursday 20 December 2007 3:00:09 am David Miller wrote:
From: Paul Moore <paul.moore(a)hp.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:29:31 -0500
> The following patch is backed against David's net-2.6 tree and is pretty
> trivial. I know we're late in the 2.6.24 cycle but I think this is worth
> merging, if you guys don't feel that way let me know and I'll resubmit it
> for 2.6.25.
Where is that patch? Or do you mean the fix you emailed
seperately today (which I will apply, thanks)?
Yes, it was the patch you applied, "XFRM: Audit function arguments
misordered". I was using stacked-git to post the patch and it apparently
doesn't annotate the cover email's subject line with "0/1" when you only
send
one patch.
Sorry about that.
> As a side note, I'm unable to actually test the patch
because I can't get
> the kernel to compile (M=net/xfrm works just fine). The problem I keep
> seeing is below:
>
> make[3]: *** No rule to make target \
> `/blah/kernels/net-2.6_xfrm-auid-secid-fix/include/linux/ticable.h', \
> needed by \
> `/blah/kernels/net-2.6_xfrm-auid-secid-fix/usr/include/linux/ticable.h'.
> \ Stop.
Remove ticable.h from include/linux/Kbuild
This is already cured in Linus's tree.
Noted, thanks.
--
paul moore
linux security @ hp