Re: [PATCH 0/7][RFC] pid: changes to support audit
On 02/19, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
On 14/02/19, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> But at first glance, can't you send 2/7 first and join 1/7 and 3/7?
Yes, Peter made the same observation. I thought it was more useful to
have them seperated out, but I'll join them.
Yes, thanks, I think it doesn't make sense to uglify the code in 1/7
and then fix it in 2/7.
> And since you change is_global_init() perhaps you can also fix
it?
> It actually needs tgid.
Sure. Can you explain why? We only want init killing off its own
threads?
Please see my reply to 5/7.
Oleg.