On Thursday 03 November 2005 08:39, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Thursday 03 November 2005 08:58, Amy Griffis wrote:
> What about someone running a kernel without CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL? With
> this implementation, they wouldn't be able to use this filtering at
> all. That doesn't make any sense, since filtering audit record types
> is inherently unrelated to syscalls. This filtering applies to audit
> in general, so it should live entirely in audit.c.
It might be tricky to untangle. I think it uses functions that only live in
that file. I think its worth looking into, though.
-Steve
This shortcoming also appears with user message filtering. Right?
-tim