On Sat, 2018-07-28 at 14:18 -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Dmitry Safonov <dima(a)arista.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2018 17:26:55 +0100
> Well, I think, I'll rework my patches set according to critics and
> separate compat xfrm layer. I've already a selftest to check that
32/64
> bit xfrm works - so the most time-taking part is done.
The way you've done the compat structures using __packed is only
going
to work on x86, just FYI.
Thanks for pointing, so I'll probably cover it under something like
HAS_COMPAT_XFRM.
(if there isn't any better idea).
The "32-bit alignment for 64-bit objects" thing x86 has is
very much
not universal amongst ABIs having 32-bit and 64-bit variants.
--
Thanks,
Dmitry