Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] (#6 U2) filesystem auditing
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 11:50 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
At least with LSM we received complaints that the real long term
maintenance impact of the hooks couldn't be properly interpreted
without seeing hook function implementations too, e.g. to see what
assumptions/dependencies they had.
That's entirely valid -- I wouldn't suggest that we show the hooks alone
_without_ the audit code. But splitting them into separate patches for
clarity is a good thing.
--
dwmw2