Re: LSM stacking in next for 6.1?
On 9/6/2022 5:10 PM, John Johansen wrote:
sorry I am wayyyy behind on this, so starting from here
On 9/6/22 16:24, Paul Moore wrote:
> I can't currently in good conscience defend the kernel/userspace
> combined label interfaces as "good", especially when we have a very
> rare opportunity to do better.
>
so I am going to grab and hold onto
>>> Further, I think we can add the new syscall API separately from the
>>> LSM stacking changes as they do have standalone value.
>>
what I think Paul is saying is we can move the LSM stacking patches
forward by removing the combined label interface.
Do you mean /proc/self/attr/interface_lsm? /proc/.../attr/context?
They won't be as
useful but it would be a huge step forward, and the next step could
be the syscall API.