On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 08:42:46 EST, John D. Ramsdell said:
were not installed. You'd think that both audit and emacs would
be
part of the base system, independent of what options are specified.
Make the business case for it. What percent of users need/want Emacs?
What percent of users need/want audit? (Hint - I'll bet there at least
an order of magnitude, possibly two entire orders, more OpenOffice users
than Emacs users). If they aren't *asking* for it, what features do the
packages provide that make it worth the added overhead? (Let 'yum' suck
down a copy of an emacs-sized RPM over a less-than-blazing net connection
sometime, and you'll understand the desire to minimize the number of things
installed by default).
In particular, I can make the case that audit should *not* be installed by
default on any box that has SELinux enabled by default - if auditd isn't running,
then SELinux AVC messages will end up in the syslog where most people expect to
find them, in a format that they can use grep and similar to deal with. If auditd
is running, suddenly those messages are in their own file in /var/log/audit/,
and they need to learn about ausearch and friends.....