On 05/29/2018 05:19 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Stefan Berger
<stefanb(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Use the new public audit functions to add the exe= and tty=
> parts to the integrity audit records. We place them before
> res=.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Suggested-by: Steve Grubb <sgrubb(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> security/integrity/integrity_audit.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/integrity_audit.c
b/security/integrity/integrity_audit.c
> index db30763d5525..8d25d3c4dcca 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/integrity_audit.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/integrity_audit.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ void integrity_audit_msg(int audit_msgno, struct inode *inode,
> audit_log_untrustedstring(ab, inode->i_sb->s_id);
> audit_log_format(ab, " ino=%lu", inode->i_ino);
> }
> + audit_log_d_path_exe(ab, current->mm);
> + audit_log_tty(ab, current);
NACK
Please add the new fields to the end of the audit record, thank you.
I put it there since Steve said '"res" is traditionally the last field
in any event' (
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/22/539). I don't mind
breaking with this tradition...
> audit_log_format(ab, " res=%d", !result);
> audit_log_end(ab);
> }