[PATCH 2/5] The error message of "-1" in field checking isnot suit
Hello Steve,
The error message of "-1" is "-F missing = for ...".
The opration isnot only "=".
So I think "F missing opration for" is better.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiliang <zhangxiliang(a)cn.fujitsu.com>
---
src/auditctl.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/auditctl.c b/src/auditctl.c
index 3958afb..a19bd14 100644
--- a/src/auditctl.c
+++ b/src/auditctl.c
@@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ static int setopt(int count, char *vars[])
audit_permadded = 1;
break;
case -1:
- fprintf(stderr, "-F missing = for %s\n",
+ fprintf(stderr, "-F missing opration for %s\n",
optarg);
retval = -1;
break;